ORIGIN Eternal Protocol
  • ORIGIN
  • ORIGIN's Creed of Freedom
  • ORIGIN Preface
  • Introduction to ORIGIN
  • ORIGIN Contract Economics
    • Internal Coordination Theory
    • The Relationship Between the Real economy and Digital Economy
    • Game Theory of ORIGIN Protocol
      • Prisoner’s Dilemma
      • ORIGIN game theory explanation
    • Social Negotiation and Distributed Autonomy
      • How to Verify the Internal Coordination Theory of the ORIGIN Protocol
      • Policy Levers
    • How these Mechanisms Create an Economic Flywheel
  • ORIGIN Protocol Septet
    • Treasury Contract
    • Sales Contract
    • Bond Contract
    • Stake Contract
    • Transaction Turbine Mechanism
    • FOMO POT prize pool
    • Anonymous Stablecoin Issuance Contract
  • ORIGIN Operating Mechanism Diagram
  • Introduction to ORIGIN's Three Primary Tokens
    • Algorithm non-stable currency LGNS
    • Introduction to Anubis privacy public chain
    • Introduction to privacy stablecoin
  • ORIGIN’s Road to Freedom and Rise
    • History of Token Economic Development
    • Dilemmas Faced by DeFi 1.0
    • ORIGIN Plays a Vital Role in The Token Economy
    • ORIGIN Launches Cross-Chain Protocol
    • ORIGIN DEX Develop is implemented
    • ORIGIN plans to innovate lending products
    • ORIGIN’s treasury value-added plan
    • Construction of ORIGIN 2.0 privacy ecosystem
    • ORIGIN 3.0 is a globally integrated financial autonomy system based on algorithmic, non-stable curre
  • ORIGIN Incentive Mechanism Model
    • LGNS Stake System (Staking)
    • Cobweb System
    • DAO Pool Rewards
    • Bond Sales Incentives
  • ORIGIN Digital Civilization Trilogy
  • ORIGIN declared to all Anonymous People
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. ORIGIN Contract Economics
  2. Game Theory of ORIGIN Protocol

ORIGIN game theory explanation

PreviousPrisoner’s DilemmaNextSocial Negotiation and Distributed Autonomy

Last updated 1 year ago

The simplest ORIGIN mode, with two players and three possible actions:

· ● Pledge LGNS (stake)

· ● Buy bonds (bond)

· ● Sell LGNS (sell)

When the LGNS staking income increases and the price of LGNS increases, players are more willing to stake LGNS. Players are most likely to sell LGNS when they predict that staking returns will decrease and prices will fall. When players have not been significantly negatively affected and have no apparent tendency, they are more willing to buy bonds (bonds have discounts, and there is room for arbitrage. The third part of the white paper, bond contracts, will elaborate on bond discounts).

Staking LGNS can push the price up by +2, and selling LGNS can push the price down by -2. Players who operate the LGNS band can get 50% of the profits. Buying the bond without pledging LGNS does not impact the price, but since the bond has a discount, the profit is +1.

As can be seen from the above table, the optimal strategy is for two players to cooperate. The result of both pledgings is 6; one buys bonds, and the other stakes 4, selling/stake and selling/buying bonds mutually. Hedging is a neutral 0; the worst outcome, where two players distrust each other and compete to sell, is -6.

Player behavior depends on premiums, market outlook, macro environment, and other factors. Nor is it necessary to attach too much importance to the numbers' size and positive and negative. The table is only to show the positive area created by cooperation.

Extreme environment.

Cooperation will produce the best results; if you don't plan on sticking with it long-term, we suggest you don't.

Participate. We don't need people who sell BTC for $50,000 and repurchase it for $30,000. The LGNS you hold is a better BTC.