♋Ⅷ.Viruses and Plagues

On February 18, 2010, Bill Gates (a member of the Freemasonry) gave a speech on carbon emissions at the TED2010 conference held in Long Beach, California, titled "Innovating to Zero" (Innovating to Zero). Four minutes and 30 seconds into his speech, he said:

"Now, if we do a great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by 10 or 15 percent. But there we see an increase of about 1.3."

"If we make good use of new vaccines, health care, and reproductive services, we may be able to reduce the total population by 10% to 15%, but currently, we are still seeing a 1.3% increase."

"Today there are 6.8 billion people in the world... that will soon be 9 billion. If we do an excellent job now with new vaccines, health care, and reproductive health services, we can reduce the population by 10% to 15%.

Bill Gates spoke these words without hesitation, stuttering, or other signs of possible error; they seemed to be a thoughtful, planned part of a well-prepared, coherent speech. When Bill Gates said, "If we do an excellent job now with new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we might be able to reduce the population by 10 to 15 percent," what does he mean?

These words imply that vaccines are one way to reduce the population, and "health care" is another, which is more like a "disease care" system that does more harm to people than it helps. The crux of this talk may be to acknowledge that from a scientific perspective, vaccine technology benefits almost no one; thus, we must ask: for what purpose did the promotion of vaccines begin so aggressively in the first place?

To gain acceptance from the majority of the population, they obviously cannot cause immediate death. If everyone began to experience sudden deaths within 24 hours of receiving a flu shot, the dangers of vaccines would become evident, and authorities would swiftly recall those vaccines. So, vaccines are to be effective in population reduction efforts. In that case, there are only three ways these vaccines can theoretically be "effective" from the perspective of those who wish to reduce the world's population.

1) They may kill people slowly and inconspicuously, promoting degenerative diseases that may take effect over 10 to 30 years.

2) They may reduce reproductive capacity and, therefore, significantly reduce the global birth rate, reducing the world's population over successive generations. This "gentle murder" method may seem more acceptable to scientists who want to see the world's population decline. , but not entirely courageous enough to kill people instantly with traditional medicine, evidence that vaccines can promote abortion already exists.

3) They may accelerate mortality in future large-scale influenza. In theory, widespread vaccination behavior may intentionally spread high-mortality, highly virulent influenza viruses. This "biochemical weapon" approach may kill millions of people. Previous vaccinations have weakened

the immune system.

Some vaccines cause this side effect, and researchers have published a study documenting these outcomes in the Public Library of Science. Read the following message: Is seasonal influenza vaccination associated with an increased risk of illness from influenza A virus in 2009? The short answer is yes: seasonal influenza vaccination causes increased infectivity against H1N1 virus pandemics. In other words, seasonal influenza vaccines may set up a large-scale "hard murder" of the population, which may kill a considerable part of the global population (as Bill Gates suggests, 10% to 15%). The deaths of these people can conveniently be attributed to pandemic influenza, thus shifting the blame away from those responsible for the conspiracy. Another function of the global population murderer is to employ widespread death as a tool of intimidation. To encourage more people to get vaccinated again, they can repeat the entire cycle until they reduce the world's population to the desired manageable level, all in the name of healthcare!

Perhaps not coincidentally, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has directed hundreds of millions of dollars to develop vaccine programs aimed at people around the world. One of these programs is to study the development of a "sweat-induced vaccine" that can use unique Coating nanomaterials to deliver vaccines to people instead of injections. Even more interestingly, his foundation has also invested millions of dollars in sterilization technology that has come to be known as the "temporary broadheading" solution. By reducing the birth rate (through sterilization technology) and increasing the spread of vaccines (through sweat-induced nano vaccines) to the global population, the goal he stated of reducing the world's population by 10% to 15% could be achieved in just a few years.

The exciting thing about all this is that this movement to reduce the global population through vaccines will significantly not impact those who consciously avoid vaccines, who tend to be more intelligent and capable people with superior abilities to think things over. Considerations to advance human civilization.

I can only imagine that the people who devised this population control measure with vaccines were probably sitting around a dinner table laughing to themselves and saying, "It's just the stupid people who are going to be killed anyway, so this is saving the human race." future!"

If humans are supposed to save themselves from self-destruction and compete as noble animals in our universe, killing the least intelligent members of society (or sterilizing them) might be a perfectly reasonable path for those who control the world. I can't entirely agree. That way, but that may be precisely what they were thinking.

Regardless, choosing to get the seasonal flu vaccine is an unquestionable admission that you have failed a universal I.Q. test, whether or not that was the intention of the world's influential people like Bill Gates, and more importantly, it is also a betrayal of your biome. It shows you don't trust your immune system to protect you from a minor infection.

Maybe the vaccine conspirators of the world believe that if the people are willing to betray themselves no matter what, it is no different than governments and institutions betraying them. In other words, if you don't even care enough about your health to look after your health, why should any government also care about protecting your health?

Avoid the 10% to 15% of people selected for the global vaccine program. You will save your life and pass the "universal I.Q. test," which determines whether you are smart enough to know that injecting chemicals and germs into your body to stop "seasonal flu" is ridiculous.

[The Rockefeller Family and Eugenics]

Since 1920, the Rockefeller Foundation, the American oil tycoon family, has funded eugenics research in Germany through the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institutes in Berlin and Munich until the Nazi Third Reich. They praised Hitler's Germany for forced sterilization and the Nazis' ideas of racial purity. John D. Rockefeller III was an advocate of eugenics who, starting in 1950, used his "tax-free" funds to launch a neo-Malthusian movement for depopulation through his private Population Council in New York.

[McNamara and the population problem]

In 1966, McNamara (former U.S. Secretary of Defense) believed that population explosion, especially in Africa, was a considerable danger. He believes that the World Bank should play a leading role in solving this problem. In a speech at Notre Dame in Paris in 1969, McNamara said: "The dead children are lucky because the millions of people who live lazily are physically stunted and mentally disabled." On the same occasion, McNamara described population growth as a "mushroom cloud of population explosion."

[Kissinger report proposes world population action plan]

The primary purpose of "National Security Study Memorandum No. 200" is to implement the "World Population Action Plan" to reduce the world's population significantly. The theoretical starting point of this new policy is that developing countries house most of the high-quality mineral deposits, and the excessive population of "inferior people" in these countries hinders the United States from accessing abundant and affordable raw materials. We must eliminate this rapid growth. Population to protect U.S. interests. Kissinger made it clear that the United States would use food aid as a "tool of national power" and that those countries receiving aid would either be sterilized or starve. The new policy of the United States is actually, "If these inferior races prevent us from obtaining abundant cheap raw materials, we must find a way to get rid of them."

[New technology in the new century]

The specific drug for SARS, bird flu, and swine flu is one drug - Tamiflu. Tamiflu was produced and marketed exclusively by Roche Pharmaceutical Group. Its patent is in the hands of Gilead Sciences in California, and Roche needs to pay royalties to Gilead Sciences, which accounts for about one-fifth of the selling price. Gilead was founded in 1987 and held the patent rights to Tamiflu for 20 years from 1996 to 2016. Donald Rumsfeld served on the company's board of directors from 1988 to 2001. From 1997 to 2001, he was the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Gilead until 2001, when he resigned from the company after entering politics and joined the Bush administration (which had close ties with the Rockefeller family, the oil conglomerate) as Secretary of Defense. Roche Pharmaceuticals is in the hands of the Rothschild family.

[Active promoter of free vaccines and genetically modified seeds]

In September 2001, Epicyte, a San Diego, California biotechnology company, announced that it had created the ultimate version of genetically modified corn - contraceptive corn. This spermicidal corn is a significant contributor to the world's population problem.

The U.S. government has long supported the development and promotion of genetically modified corn technology that can kill human sperm. And corn is a staple food in Mexico and many Latin American countries. Mitch Hein, President of Epicyte, the company developing spermicidal corn, said the technology could solve the world's "overpopulation." As for the moral and ethical considerations of allowing people in poor third-world countries to eat this magical corn unknowingly, Mitch Hein avoided talking about it.

The Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, and Annan's Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa will generously provide genetically modified corn with concealed spermicide ingredients to hungry people in the third world. They will also supply vaccines to populations in developing countries containing undisclosed sterilizing ingredients. These are just two documented examples of "population reduction" using vaccines or genetically modified seeds.

[The real victims of the swine flu scandal are Asia, Africa, and Latin America]

Leftover vaccines became an issue in December 2009 when the European Parliament began investigating the WHO flu scandal. Now, Europe will donate 180 million flu vaccines to the WHO, and the organization will distribute these vaccines free of charge to 95 developing countries. Thirty-five countries, including Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, and Mongolia, have requested free vaccines.

Some analysts believe that donating vaccines to third-world countries has multiple purposes. First, it is to eliminate the embarrassment of purchasing vast quantities of useless vaccines. Second, it is an excellent opportunity to observe what proportion of vaccine recipients the vaccine will cause health harm. Third, It is to test the effectiveness of vaccines as a means of killing people. The World Health Organization can package these things in the name of charity.

Since the occupation by the United States, the Iraqi people have been deceived and unknowingly begun to eat "fully genetically modified crops." Deceptive practices have led Iraqi land to cultivate genetically modified crops. The world was shocked by the U.S. President's "Order No. 81." This order established Iraq as a significant hub for genetically modified crops, and it is also considered the official start of the world's "Third Opium War," focused on genetically modified crops replacing opium in food production.

Estimates suggest that it could cause the deaths of an additional 1.5 billion people in Asia. Suppose the United States successfully implements its Middle East strategy, along with the involvement of Southeast Asian countries and overseas nations. In that case, experts estimate that genetic warfare will eradicate a total of 3 billion people from the Earth within 50 years, effectively resolving the population problem within this century.

However, modified genetic crops have gone far beyond the natural structural framework. Within a few generations, authorities will exterminate users; that is, the descendants of users will suddenly become unable to have children. This phenomenon is the binding and corrective ability of nature's framework, and it is also central intelligence. This is a phenomenon that the Bureau and its dozens of biochemical research centers are very aware of. Genetically modified crops can be called "life-destroying opium." The President's "Order No. 81" gave the Iraqi people only two options: one, to produce "life-threatening opium"; the other, all of them were massacred or starved to death. The Iraqi people have no choice but to grow "life-threatening opium."

Statistics on the U.S. government's special funding for "biodefense" research

After the "Busat" plan surfaced, U.S. officials not only significantly increased relevant scientific research expenditures but also strengthened public education to explain to the public the risks of biological weapons (especially biological weapons based on genetically modified technology). Of course, they also honestly told the public that once such an attack occurs, the United States does not have enough technical measures to prevent and compensate for it effectively.

A public education document released by the CIA said: A symposium of scientists from the National Academy of Sciences and other institutions pointed out that biological weapons attacks in the 21st century will be "darker," that is, more covert, based on genetic technology.

Covert terrorist activities.

Scientific research experiments by scientists from Australia and other countries have shown that genetically modified technology decomposes the "killer gene" (weaponized gene) components and then introduces them into the body. Usually, everything appears predictable, but once these components intersect, they start to contribute to the onset of disease, disability, or death. Effect to death. Various importation methods can be effected against U.S. citizens in the United States or other countries. During incubation, existing medical technology cannot make timely and accurate judgments. Therefore, the attacks of weapons based on genetic technology are more covert or more covert and are more difficult to detect and prevent.

On December 2, 2008, entrusted by the U.S. Congress, some scholars from the U.S. "Weapons of Mass Destruction and Terrorism Prevention and Control Commission" collected a large amount of information from various countries in Europe, America, Asia, and Africa, and sent a question to the then U.S. President Bush. A lengthy report for The World at Risk. The report said that the threat of terrorist attacks faced by the United States and the world continues to develop. The threat mainly comes from two aspects that are difficult to prevent and compensate for. One is atomic weapons, and the other is biological weapons.

The report said that the United States and Russia possess most of the world's atomic weapons. Therefore, as long as the two countries cooperate with other nuclear-weapon states, there is still hope to control the use of atomic weapons. However, the United States and Russia cannot possess most biological weapons: under today's technical conditions, a private organization can possess genetically modified technology

and biological weapons of mass destruction. At present and in the foreseeable future, the threat and risk of biological weapons attacks is no less than that of atomic weapons and may even be more significant and more serious. Therefore, how to prevent and control terrorist attacks caused by biological weapons is not only an urgent matter but also a major national security issue that is needed for a long time. To this end, it is not only necessary to strengthen scientific research related to optimization but also to strengthen citizen education so that civil society has a sufficient understanding of the risks of biological weapons attacks.

After receiving the report, the Bush administration significantly increased funding for relevant scientific research. When Obama took office in 2009, the committee submitted its report again. This year, the Obama administration signed an executive order to strengthen and optimize the "Busat" program, taking "biological defense" to a newer level.

Due to confidentiality, people do not know to what extent genetic weapons and genetically modified weapons have been developed and what equipment they have. However, since the "Busat" plan is mainly a prevention and treatment plan, it means that the United States has sufficient proof and understanding of the lethality of genes and genetically modified technologies and products, indicating that this type of biological weapons has developed to the point where it can The use is relatively high. Otherwise, what should we target, and how should we implement a prevention and control plan?

In terms of development, genetically modified technology and products are becoming or have become a hidden means of mass destruction that is no less threatening than atomic bombs. As for biological weapons that use genes or transgenics as the primary means, if a private organization develops them, no one outside may know about their performance and power, their means of carrying and circulation channels, or even the target country. Any urban restaurant or any piece of rural farmland may become a manufacturing site and storage site for biological and genetic weapons. Therefore, it is difficult to take preventive measures, and the threat of destruction is even more severe.

In this regard, the essential thinking of the United States is any science and technology, including genetically modified technology, not only benefits mankind but also harms or even destroys mankind. Atomic energy can generate electricity and be a means of mass destruction. Therefore, one of the first considerations when using nuclear energy to generate electricity is risk management, such as preventing nuclear radiation or nuclear leakage.

In the same way, genetically modified technology can be used to supplement energy needs and other issues, or it can also become a weapon of mass destruction. Therefore, one of the primary considerations for using genetically modified technology is risk management, such as how to prevent attacks by genetic weapons or genetically modified weapons. For this reason, and again, expand the "Busat" plan.

Wangari Maathai, the 2004 Nobel Peace Prize winner and Kenyan environmental activist, said on October 9, 2004: "HIV is a biological agent deliberately created by laboratories in Western countries. Some people say that HIV comes from monkeys. I am Skeptical because we have been living with monkeys since immemorial," Maathai said.

Maathai said at a press conference in Nairobi, the capital of Kenya: "On this planet, many more black people die from AIDS than other races. This is a preparation created by some people to eliminate others. Without those people, there would be no need to invade Iraq."

Indonesian Health Minister Supali believes that swine flu is an artificial virus.

Agence France-Presse reports that Indonesian Health Minister Siti Fatila Supali said on Tuesday (January 28, 2009) that the deadly swine flu virus may be "man-made"; she called on people to pay attention to the worldwide epidemic. Stay calm about the swine flu epidemic. The minister told a news conference that whether the swine flu virus was genetically engineered was unclear, but he did not rule out the possibility.

Supali also published a book called "It's Time to Change the World - The Mysterious Hand Behind Bird Flu," in which she accused the United States of using bird flu virus samples submitted by Indonesia to the WHO to create biological and chemical weapons. U.S. Defense Secretary Gates recently visited Indonesia. A reporter asked whether the United States was using avian influenza virus samples provided by Indonesia to develop biochemical weapons. Gates looked angry and replied: "This is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard."

Dr. Gibbutz believes the H1N1 virus is man-made.

In a soon-to-be-released report, Australian virus expert Adrian Gibbs claims that the H1N1 influenza virus originated in a laboratory, not in nature, and may even have been deliberately created. Gibuz, now retired, reported the matter to the World Health Organization headquarters in Geneva last weekend and said the report would be published online. Gibbons was the first scientist to analyze the genetic makeup of the influenza A (H1N1) virus. Gibbons and two colleagues analyzed the sequences of hundreds of amino acids encoded by the eight genes of the influenza virus and found that comparing the genetic sequence of the influenza A virus with the genetic sequence of another similar virus, Then look at how different the two are. Influenza A viruses are closely related to swine influenza viruses. Use this evidence as a clue to speculate on how the virus has changed in the past. The frequency of genetic mutations of the virus is three times higher than that of viruses commonly found in pigs, indicating that the virus cannot come from pigs.